Zuvanich: Request for help with Heisman vote gets big response

A week ago, when I asked college football fans to help me decide which players should receive my vote for the Heisman Trophy, I wasn’t sure what to expect.

Stanford's Toby Gerhart runs against Arizona State Oct. 24 in Stanford, Calif. Gerhart has been invited to the Heisman Trophy presentation as a finalist, along with Mark Ingram, Ndamukong Suh, Tim Tebow and Colt McCoy. (AP)

I figured at least a few people would tell me I had no business voting for the prestigious award in the first place, and since we’re squarely in Texas Tech territory, I half-expected some folks to suggest their favorite Red Raiders, even though they have virtually no chance of winning. I also feared that hardly anyone would respond, which would have put me in quite a pickle in terms of a follow-up story.

As it turned out, though, the response was much greater than I could have imagined. The first fan vote popped in my inbox less than 30 minutes after my column was posted to RedRaiders.com, and they continued to pour in until the Heisman voting deadline at 4 p.m. Monday.

There were 205 votes in all – counting e-mails and comments posted to my column and Zuvie’s Views blog – with fans offering a fairly wide range of suggestions and an even wider range of reasons. I got responses from all over Texas and from all corners of the country, and the vast majority were thoughtful and respectful.

And a couple fans made me laugh, specifically the one who said I would be considered a communist unless I voted for Stanford running back Toby Gerhart.

So, how did the fan vote shake out? Drum roll, please …

One player received a lion’s share of the votes and, surprisingly, it was Gerhart with 88. I must admit I had never even heard of the guy before I started doing some research for last week’s column, and I almost grew tired of hearing about him by the end of the week.

Most of Gerhart’s supporters pointed to his superior statistics – he leads the nation in rushing yards and touchdowns – the fact that he almost single-handedly led the Cardinal to a surprisingly successful run in the Pac-10 Conference and his exploits off the field. Gerhart is balancing football with 21 credit hours this semester, and he also plays minor league baseball.

Texas quarterback Colt McCoy (12) is sacked by Nebraska defensive tackle Ndamukong Suh (93) Dec. 5 in Arlington. Suh and McCoy have both been invited to the Heisman Trophy presentation as finalists, along with Mark Ingram, Toby Gerhart and Tim Tebow. (AP)

As for the claims that his Heisman candidacy was not the result of a massive public relations campaign, those people should see my inbox. I got three e-mails from Stanford’s media relations director, and several of the fan votes for Gerhart came from Stanford students and alumni who essentially attached their name to a form letter.

Thanks to a last-minute push, Nebraska defensive tackle Ndamukong Suh took second in my unofficial poll. Well over half of the 47 votes for Suh came in on Monday, and several more of his supporters made their cases after the voting deadline.

I’m guessing Suh’s performance in Saturday’s Big 12 Conference championship game, in which he registered 41/2 sacks and seven tackles for loss, had something to do with it.

Texas quarterback Colt McCoy got the third-most votes with 38, and believe it or not, many of them came from Texas Tech fans. McCoy even got a nod from a Stanford professor who must not have gotten the memo about Gerhart.

Next in line were Florida quarterback Tim Tebow (16 votes) and Houston quarterback Case Keenum (nine), who like McCoy is a native West Texan. Alabama running back Mark Ingram got two votes, while TCU quarterback Andy Dalton, Notre Dame quarterback Jimmy Clausen, Mississippi running back Dexter McCluster, Texas Tech defensive end Brandon Sharpe and Tech quarterback Taylor Potts received one apiece.

But I’m pretty sure the vote for Potts was a joke.

Finally, the moment you’ve all been waiting for. Here’s how I voted, in order, along with an explanation for each player:

• Ndamukong Suh, DT, Sr., Nebraska: I knew going in that Suh would be on my ballot, and I wasn’t going to make him first unless he led the Cornhuskers to an upset win over Texas in the Big 12 title game. That didn’t quite happen, but Suh did more than his part and clearly outplayed Texas’ McCoy.

And the more I thought about the overriding question, “Who is the most outstanding player in college football?” voting for Suh become more and more obvious. No other player in the country can do what he does, and if I could put together my own team of current college players, the 6-foot-4, 300-pound Suh would easily be my first choice.

As a first-time Heisman voter, I also wanted to make a statement. A full-time defensive player has never won the award, which has gone to a quarterback in eight of the last nine seasons, and I’d like to see both of those trends change.

• Colt McCoy, QB, Sr., Texas: McCoy was my frontrunner heading into the weekend, but his lackluster performance against Nebraska – passing for just 184 yards with three interceptions – dropped him into second behind Suh.

Still, the four-year starter from Tuscola Jim Ned is certainly deserving of a second straight trip to New York City. McCoy is the leader of an unbeaten team that will play for the BCS national championship, he’s the winningest quarterback in NCAA history, and his numbers this season are just as good as any other signal caller.

• Toby Gerhart, RB, Sr., Stanford: Two other players, Keenum and Ingram, came close to securing the last spot on my ballot. But Keenum threw three interceptions in Saturday’s loss to East Carolina – somewhat overshadowing his 527 yards and five touchdowns – and I’m guessing he’ll be one of the lead candidates next year if he continues to be the nation’s most prolific passer and the Cougars continue their ascension.

Despite Ingram’s stellar performance in the Southeastern Conference championship game, in which he racked up nearly 200 total yards and scored three touchdowns, the talented sophomore wasn’t as consistently productive as Gerhart. The Stanford senior leads the nation with 1,736 rushing yards and 26 TDs, and he often carries the Cardinal offense.

And because I soliticited input from fans, and Gerhart was the clear favorite, I felt compelled to put him on my ballot.

Thanks to everyone who offered their opinions. They were a tremendous help, and even if your choice wasn’t mine, I took each and every suggestion to heart.

Most of all, I hope you enjoyed this excersise as much as I did.

To comment on this story:

adam.zuvanich@lubbockonline.com l 766-8733

courtney.linehan@lubbockonline.com l 766-8735

Comments

  • noel said:

    yes, but gerhart lost too many games to be considered. ingram is the man who meets the unsaid criteria. less than 2 losses and huge numbers. one question, where is bama w/out him…? nuff said!!!
    WRECK’EM!!!

    Report this comment

  • Watchdog113 said:

    Joke? Seriously…you say that about our QB? Shame on you…

    Report this comment

  • Watchdog113 said:

    Now Sharp that’s one big loss for the Red Raiders. Thanks for your playing for the Red Raiders. Good Luck in the NFL.

    Report this comment

  • OL grad 54 said:

    After your thoughtful review of pros and cons—-I think your decision was logical and correct -It;’s SUH.

    Report this comment

  • Brian said:

    Keenum is a senior i believe!!!!!

    Report this comment

  • dsc said:

    Maybe it should be Brandon Carter after the way he played against SUH.

    Report this comment

  • orange_4_me said:

    Colt is going to win the Heisman. The big Orange Industry Complex is at work, rant all you want. See ya!!! Next year in Lubbock, nothing changes a loss as usual against UT!!!

    Report this comment

  • TTChick said:

    Suh or Ingram…Colt has not had a great year & the wins his team managed to barely put together over unranked teams, was due to their defense stepping up. If anyone on the Longhorn team should’ve been nominated, it is Shipley.

    Report this comment

  • Sam said:

    Colt is a very nice boy, but there is no way he is the best college football player. A Heisman quality QB could have managed to put more points on the board in a Championship game. And he almost blew the whole thing with a very stupid last play! Not even close to Heisman material.

    But because the media has invested an huge amount of effort into getting him the award, he will probably win it. What a shame.

    Report this comment

  • Clark said:

    Potts is a joke. Sheffield, please.

    Report this comment

  • noel said:

    ingram, perhaps suh, but his team has lost too many games to be a real consideration. sorry, that’s how it works out though. colt’s chances have evaporated, as will their national title hopes when they see a REAL defense against bama…yup, good luck w/ that wHORNS!!!

    Report this comment

  • ttrr said:

    Well, I hope you listen to your mother better than your readers. Maybe next year you want get a vote and there well be joy among us.

    Report this comment

  • Voice of Reason said:

    Mr. Zuvanich,
    How were you qualified to vote for the 2009 Heisman Memorial Trophy Award if you were unaware of the player who lead the Football Bowl Subdivision (formerly known as Division 1-A) in rushing yards and touchdowns scored in 2009 (ie. Toby Gerhart)?

    My concern is that the Heisman Memorial Trophy Award has become a popularity contest determined by many uninformed voters and it is not given to the most outstanding player in collegiate football for the respective year of the award.

    Colt McCoy would not have never seen the field ahead of Graham Harrell if he had come to Texas Tech or if Graham Harrell would have taken the scholarship offer to UT.

    Your derogatory comment towards Taylor Potts is classless. Taylor is far more qualified to receive a Heisman Trophy Award vote in your straw poll than you are to cast a vote for the 2009 Heisman Memorial Trophy Award due to your self-admitted lack of knowledge.

    Report this comment

  • Rod Anderson said:

    Noel: I guess the guys who voted Tewbow the winner just two years ago didn’t get the memo about not being able to win with more than two losses, much less four. I guess you never heard of Paul Hornung, the QB from Notre Dame who played on a losing team? Are you just a “homer” and do you pride yourself on talking about things you obviously know little, if anything, about? For the record here is a list of the Heisman winners who played for teams with 4 or more losses:

    Year Winner Record
    2007 Tim Tebow, QB, Florida 9-4
    1987 Tim Brown, WR, Notre Dame 8-4
    1985 Bo Jackson, RB, Auburn 8-4
    1980 George Rogers, RB, So. Carolina 8-4
    1969 Steve Owens, HB, Oklahoma 6-4
    1956 Paul Hornung, QB, Notre Dame 2-8
    1935 Jay Berwanger, HB, Chicago 4-4

    Please try to do a modicum of research before spouting off

    Report this comment

  • Rod Anderson said:

    Noel: One more thing, Ingram didn’t put up huge numbers, in fact at his rate he would need 3 extra games, or 1/4 of a season to catch Gerhart in total yards rushing; and he would need 8 more games or over 1/2 of another season to catch Gerhart in scoring. Of course, if those extra games are all against Auburn, well, let’s just say it’s going to take a while.

    For the record, Ingram had a fine season, and especially so for his sophomore year. He will get better, but his up and down production and his season totals do not make him Heisman worthy. You ask where would Alabama be without Ingram? I will tell you, the same place they were, in their end of the year grudge match with the boys from the plain, Auburn. They won that big game without him, and there were two other games where he was not even the rushing leader on his own team.

    For all the hullabaloo regarding his big game against Florida, it was a good game, but I respectfully point out that he was not the star of the game, or the MVP, for the Tide. That was the QB as voted on by the press. Moreover, the two other running backs together combined for more yards and had much higher YPC than Ingram. So I would say they would have been pretty fair without in that beat-down.

    Again, please try to do some reading besides the Alabama press releases.

    Report this comment