Information becoming scarce in sports

Like it does every week during the football season, Texas Tech distributed a written transcript of Monday’s news conference to members of the media.

Absent from Monday’s transcript, which included comments from head coach Mike Leach and players Shawn Byrnes and Jamar Wall, were their thoughts on the subject that dominated the actual news conference: All-American offensive lineman Brandon Carter had been suspended indefinitely a day earlier for violating unspecified team rules, and after Carter and linebacker Marlon Williams posted not-so-flattering comments on their Twitter accounts on Sunday, Leach banned his players from using the social networking site to discuss football-related topics.

Except for one comment from Byrnes about how Carter’s loss will impact the Red Raiders, and Wall saying he’s “not too sure” about the “suspension thing,” neither topic was addressed on the transcript. Instead, it mostly included comments about Tech’s improved running game against Houston, the offensive line’s play and how the Red Raiders plan to bounce back from consecutive losses as they prepare to host New Mexico on Saturday.

Chris Cook, Tech’s associate athletic director for media relations, insisted his department is “not trying to hide anything,” and that the distributed transcripts “never” are complete. He also pointed out that Monday’s news conference – along with every other throughout the season – can be viewed in its entirety on Tech’s athletic Web site on a subscription-only basis.

“The content is available, but what we send out – not to censor it or anything like that – is just to hit the high points,” said Cook, adding timeliness is another reason the transcripts are condensed. “That’s what a lot of people do.”

Cook is absolutely correct about that last part. Tech certainly is not the only college football program that picks and chooses the information it disperses to the public, or limits media access to its players and coaches.

Last season, a couple days before Tech faced Nevada, I wrote a column about how the Wolf Pack didn’t allow any of their players to do phone interviews with out-of-town media. And just two weeks ago, I had a similar experience with the University of Texas.

After submitting a list of players I wished to speak with to Texas’ media relations staff, I was told only head coach Mack Brown and two predetermined players would be available on a conference call. I also was directed to transcripts of the Longhorns’ local news conferences, which were posted on UT’s athletic Web site.

But when reading stories about the Longhorns published by the daily newspapers in Austin and Houston, I noticed almost none of the quotes they used appeared on the transcripts. What UT had furnished on its Web site appeared to be a watered-down version.

Last year, Oklahoma didn’t even provide that much. The only access we had to Sooners coach Bob Stoops and his players were videos of their news conferences posted to – you guessed it – OU’s athletic Web site.

More and more, college athletic programs and other prominent sports teams, players and organizations – from the NFL to the NBA to professional golfer Tiger Woods – are trying to control the message received by the general public. Just about everyone these days has his own Web site, Facebook page, or Twitter account, and thus a way to produce his own “news” stories.

“When there’s something negative out there, we want to find a way to turn it around. That’s your job,” Cook said. “And by turn it around I don’t mean lie or fabricate anything, but find a silver lining and use it – or put an end to it as quickly as possible.”

That’s not a new concept by any means, and it’s certainly not exclusive to the sporting world. But it does seem to be more and more prevalent among college athletic programs – many of which are part of publicly funded universities – and the trend is no less disturbing in an age when the line between objective reporting and marketing is becoming increasingly blurred.

Cook said he believes fans will always look to newspapers and other historically credible media outlets for information, but he also expects to “see more and more college Web sites start competing with the media.”

In many ways, they’re already doing that, but it’s under the umbrella of marketing and public relations.

Our job, like it always has been, is to tell you the whole story.

To comment on this story:

adam.zuvanich@lubbockonline.com l 766-8733

courtney.linehan@lubbockonline.com l 766-8735

Bookmark and Share

Comments

  • Darnce said:

    Tech has lost two very tough road games to #2 and #12 by a total of 11 points. The sky is not falling. They say: “Lose early.” Now let’s get on with the season, win some games, and get into the conference race. This very capable team and coaching staff will do it.

    Report this comment

  • TallMike said:

    The premise of this piece is silly. Becoming scare ???? LOL !!

    A reporter can take notes, record the comments, even video the comments….’do your job !’

    Report this comment

  • Jason said:

    TallMike, I think you’ve missed the point here. Journalism aims to produce an objective picture (as objective as possible) of a situation and sports journalism is no different. When information is limited it inherently reduces the objectivity, especially if the source of that information is the party trying to spin the information in a positive light–or at least in a different direction. This is exactly the case when TTU and other universities so tightly control distribution of information. When all you have are canned video clips that don’t tell the whole story then a journalist cannot do his or her job of reporting all sides of a story.

    Here’s a fair question: Is it okay for a publicly-funded institution such as Texas Tech to withhold information from the public? Isn’t the overarching purpose of the First Amendment to ensure that governmental entities don’t control the public by controlling the public’s access to information about those entities’ operations?

    Report this comment

  • JMH said:

    Jason, that’s the dumbest thing I’ve ever heard. You’re an idiot!

    Report this comment

  • Ralph said:

    No, Jason, that’s not really that dumb, and anyone who doesn’t understand this, doesn’t understand TRUE journalism, or objectivity for that matter.

    Report this comment

  • Raider Fan said:

    Adam,

    I think the real question is “what is news?” The ground breaking story that two Tech players were upset with the fact that they are 2-2 to start their senior seasons is not news. The fact that there is some backtalk to Leach that caused suspensions and tighter control by the coaches is not news. I think that there are so many people in the Twitter/Blogger/Facebook age that feel that gossip is news. It is not. The team and players are only relevant in the sense that they are able to produce a product on the field. The constant micro-analysis of the lives and feelings of 18-21 year old college kids (and usually the ones in the media are not the brightest bulbs in the pack) is not news and makes life harder for the coaches, professors, parents and other mentors of these student athletes.

    I don’t think that your issue is any different than it would be in corporate America. Go try to interview Coke about its soft drink formulas or any pharmaceutical company about its research and development and see whether you get access to the people who matter or whether you get a glossed over PR presentation that vaguely talks about the subject you are interested in. I am not saying that it is right or wrong but I do not think that your issue is new or unique. Remember, people do have the right not to talk to the media and to follow the wishes of their bosses, coaches etc. who do not want media attention. If you do not think that is true, just try airing your problems with your editors or the executives of your paper in your columns and see how long you last.

    Report this comment

Trackbacks

There are no trackbacks