Comments on: NCAA says Alabama football team must vacate wins from 2005-07

By: Tim Norwood

Tim Norwood — Thu, 25 Jun 2009 20:55:53 +0000

What about the Winners $ Millions?????? Do we get that now?

(Report comment)

By: raider 1011

raider 1011 — Sun, 14 Jun 2009 22:15:37 +0000

illegal T D is right , the guy was on his knee when he caught the ball. that call still brothers me.

(Report comment)

By: Eddie P

Eddie P — Sun, 14 Jun 2009 14:17:45 +0000

Well, they mentioned the difference between forfeit and vacate twice in the story. You would be referring to horrible officiating or maybe officiating with the intent of helping one school over the other. Hicks was raped the whole day by Alabama dbs.

(Report comment)

By: DWR

DWR — Sun, 14 Jun 2009 13:54:09 +0000

I emailed the writer who broke the story to ask him if Tech is now the winner of the 2005 Cotton Bowl. He said no, because Alabama will not forfeit those games they will vacate those games. That means no one won the game. I wish we would be named the winner since one of their touchdowns was illegal anyway.

(Report comment)

By: noel

noel — Sat, 13 Jun 2009 16:42:50 +0000

boy, didn’t they throw those good ole boys into the briar patch….?

(Report comment)

By: nmraider16

nmraider16 — Sat, 13 Jun 2009 15:27:10 +0000

Does this mean we just picked up our first Cotton Bowl win? LOL

(Report comment)

By: Ben

Ben — Fri, 12 Jun 2009 20:57:38 +0000

what a joke. 10 years ago TTU athletes were allowed to make long distance phone calls and we lost scholarships. NCAA continues to practice its methodology of double standard.

(Report comment)