Nebraska denies Lady Raiders’ comeback bid

BY TRAVIS CRAM l AVALANCHE-JOURNAL

LINCOLN, Neb. — Texas Tech went on a 19-4 run in the final 7:34 of its game Saturday at Devaney Sports Center against Nebraska, fueled by Jordan Murphree’s three 3-pointers and 13 points during the run.

But the Cornhuskers’ four points during the run was all they needed to help seal the 62-56 win.

“Close but not close enough,” Tech head coach Kristy Curry said.

Tech (14-10, 4-6 Big 12 Conference) needed more points early on after going down 56-37 with less than eight minutes to play, but could find very little help from the inside — especially from Dominic Seals who sat out the remaining 5:28 after hitting only 2 of 9 from the field for four points and grabbing five rebounds.

Jordan Murphree

Jordan Murphree

The Lady Raiders also had to make do without senior point guard Maria Moore. She did not start the game due to a bone bruise on her left knee she suffered in the win Wednesday against Texas A&M.

“I didn’t like (Seals’) effort as a senior on the road in Big 12 play when our backs are against the wall. I was disappointed in her effort today for 30 minutes. Obviously we struggled without Moore, there’s no question about it. But there are no excuses. … We weren’t able to rise above (adversity) today and that especially starts with Dominic.”

Murphree’s free throws and jumper and senior Tiny Henderson’s three field goals started off the run to cut the lead to 56-47 with 4:02 to play.

Nebraska’s Cory Montgomery — who finished with 17 points and 11 rebounds for her sixth double-double — hit the only field goal of the final seven minutes for the Cornhuskers to push the lead back to 11 before Murphree, who finished with a game-high 18 points, drained the first of three consecutive 3-pointers. The final trey followed a pair of free throws by Montgomery to make it 60-56 with 48 seconds left.

But Mallard was double-teamed and missed a shot underneath and Henderson failed to hit a jumper from the free-throw line after Catheryn Redmon missed the first of a 1-and-1 opportunity but sunk the next two free throws.

Redmon would miss two more from the line with 13 seconds left but Dominique Kelley grabbed the rebound and watched the clock finally wind down.

Nebraska (11-12, 2-8) beat Tech for the first time in 13 attempts — its last win coming on Feb. 9, 1997 in a 62-57 win in Lincoln and snapped a five-game losing streak.

“We like to make it interesting,” Nebraska coach Connie Yori said with a smile on her face for the first time in weeks. “I wasn’t ready to walk out of the gym and think we had that thing won and neither were they. … I’m ecstatic. People just don’t quite understand how hard it is to win one, single ballgame in this league.”

The loss denied Tech a consecutive Big 12 win again. The Lady Raiders have not won consecutive conference games since winning back-to-back home games against Kansas and Nebraska last season. Tech has not won consecutive home-away games since 2007 (vs. Texas, at Kansas).

Nebraska used its defensive pressure early on to force seven turnovers by the Lady Raiders. The Cornhuskers went on a 10-2 run to push their lead to 15-9 while Tech went without a field goal for nearly four minutes.

The Lady Raiders would tie it up at 19-19 with five minutes left on Henderson’s jumper to cap a 10-4 run of its own.

But Nebraska continued to give Tech problems inside and forced a total of 12 turnovers in the first half as Yvonne Turner’s 3-pointer with 28 seconds left put the Cornhuskers up 28-23 at the break. Tech had only two field goals in the final 4:50 of the first half while Nebraska scored nine points.

The loss leaves Curry with six more chances to win enough games to stay in the hunt for a NCAA Tournament berth and better seeding in the Big 12 tournament before the talk may quickly turn to the WNIT.

“We’ve got to realize that this thing isn’t over and we’ve got a great opportunity with six games to go,” Curry said. “We need to get three or four or five, six more. I think that’s where we’re at — three, four, five or six and we’ll decide who we want to be.”

To comment on this story:
travis.cram@lubbockonline.com l 766-8736
jeff.walker@lubbockonline.com l 766-8735

Bookmark and Share

Comments

  • Silver said:

    I agree with her and Seals, a complete no-show today and that can’t happen.

    (Report comment)

  • Ralphie said:

    Not enough “athleticism” or “energy”!!

    (Report comment)

  • Bob said:

    Great seven minutes of basketball. Too bad your “energy” level was pathetic the other 33 minutes of the game.

    This is a sad, dumb team.

    (Report comment)

  • MaverickMatador said:

    This team is embarrassing. After Seals thought they would not lose so badly at Texas, I guess she might be satisfied by not losing so much to a poor Nebraska team. This was a must-win for a team wanting to get into the NCAA tournament. If getting to play at home, if you make the tournament, is not enough of an incentive for these players, I cannot think of anything that can motivate them. Stick a fork in them – they are done!

    (Report comment)

  • Drew said:

    this reminded me of last year, couldnt make a shot to save our lives!

    (Report comment)

  • Tom said:

    After losing to the last place team-why are we concerned about the NCAA tourney? We can’t shoot when open, no defensive adjustments, too many stupid turnovers every game and the coaches look like they’re in a stupor most of the time-no fire in anybody’s belly. Repeated boneheads need to be rewarded with a place on the bench!

    (Report comment)

  • Morris said:

    I’m sad to see the state that the Lady Raiders have fallen into under Ms. Curry. I watched a good portion of the second half of yesterday’s game. The team looked ill prepared and disorganised. That’s a serious coaching problem. I’m not speaking from no knowledge about coaching or competing as an athlete. I was a scholarship baseball player at Tech my first two years at Tech and signed a pro contract after my second year. I also coached baseball teams (13 and 14) for several years where I live.

    I’m also bothered about Ms Curry about a young person who was suspended last year who later transferred to SMU. That young lady stated that she did not understand why she was suspended. Whether that’s true or not is not my point. It’s a serious coaching problem when a coach kicks a player off the team and that player doesn’t understand why.

    I think Ms Curry rates another year as it appears that the recruiting class from last November appears to be pretty good. I also understand that she did not inherit a full sack when she arrived at Tech.

    Thanks for listioning.

    (Report comment)

  • Eric in New Mexico said:

    Yeah, Curry! Blame it on Seals, or one of the other players, or energy level. That way, you never have to take the blame. That’s like a supervisor blaming the employees for the department’s poor performance. Maybe she thinks this is the year 1910 and that stuff will fool people.

    (Report comment)

  • watchdog113 said:

    Now this was a bad hire Myers. Stealing her wasn’t worth the loot.

    (Report comment)