Tech’s loss to Mizzou serves as lesson in program-building

BY JEFF WALKER
A-J SPORTS EDITOR

COLUMBIA, Mo. — Pat Knight caught a glimpse of the future during Saturday’s 97-86 loss at Missouri.

At least, that’s what the Texas Tech men’s basketball coach is hoping.

Three years into Mike Anderson’s tenure, the Tigers are built and playing the way their coach expects.

Knight can only hope the same holds true for his Red Raiders, who committed a season-high 29 turnovers against the Tigers in front of 13,357 at Mizzou Arena.

“Mike’s done a good job. I mean, you guys know where it was,” Knight said. “He took it from ground zero and now he’s got it built up very well. It took him three years to get his type of players in here and now he’s done it.”

In a society that mostly lives by the what-have-you-done-for-me-lately philosophy in sports, patience might be Knight’s toughest battle. His team allowed at least 50 points in a half for the eighth time this season as Missouri ran out to a 53-41 halftime advantage.

Missouri (17-3, 4-1 Big 12 Conference) led by as many as 18 before the break as the “fastest 40 minutes in basketball,” which is Mizzou’s mantra this season, forced Tech into 17 first-half turnovers.

The Red Raiders (11-8, 1-3) had five turnovers in the first two minutes.

“I really thought we hurt ourselves, especially early on,” Knight said. “Their defense forces a lot of turnovers, but it shouldn’t be that many. We made a lot of dumb passes, a lot of dumb plays and kind of rushed ourselves.”

Tech used a late spurt to get the game back to a manageable margin by halftime, but the Tigers built the lead back up to 18 by the 14:36 mark of the second half.

More turnovers hurt the Red Raiders, but they continued to fight for rebounds and continued to draw fouls.

Tech reached the one-and-one situation at the 12:50 mark, and the Red Raiders were in the double-bonus situation with 10:20 to play.

Fewer turnovers helped Tech trim the deficit to 77-70 following a 3-pointer by Alan Voskuil at the 6:38 mark.

Missouri’s Marcus Denmon, who had only three points at that point, scored seven in the next two minutes to put the game out of reach.

Tech got to within nine points twice in the final 2:28, but DeMarre Carroll — who finished with a game-high 27 points — nailed two big jumpers, and the Tigers made six consecutive free throws in the final minute to seal the victory.

“Pat has been talking about competing and fighting and toughness, and I think you saw that,” Anderson said. “I thought they fought tooth and nail, and that’s why when you look at the rebounding discrepancy, I thought that they wanted it more.”

Tech out-rebounded Mizzou, 46-30, led by eight boards from Voskuil and seven each from D’walyn Roberts and Nick Okorie. Rebounding has been a sore spot under this coaching staff, but the Red Raiders managed to get more rebounds than their opponent for the third time in four conference games.

The Red Raiders might suffer some more growing pains, though, as they travel to College Station on Wednesday to face Texas A&M.

Missouri’s growth took three years. Anderson took over a team that finished 12-16, 5-11 in Quin Snyder’s final season in 2005-06. The Tigers finished 11th in the Big 12 that year.

Missouri finished below .500 in the Big 12 in each of Anderson’s first two seasons, but he now has the Tigers near the top of the conference standings and inching toward a top-25 ranking for the first time since the 2003-04 season.

“I’ve got more guys that can do a lot of different things than in the last couple years,” Anderson said. “I think in the last couple of years, we were limited with what we could do, especially with how I want to play. Now, I think we have more guys that fit what we do. … When you’ve got guys that can do different things, that makes basketball a whole lot of fun.”

To comment on this story:
jeff.walker@lubbockonline.com uE06C 766-8735
terry.greenberg@lubbockonline.com uE06C 766-8700

Bookmark and Share

Comments

  • Eric in New Mexico said:

    Give Coach Knight and the program some time and I believe things will improve dramatically. GO RAIDERS!

    Report this comment

  • jkc said:

    How can a Big 12 team not have a decent point guard??? Where is our backup?????

    Roberson is killing us again this year. He can’t pass, he can’t shoot, he can’t defend & he can’t lead the team on offense. And he does not care about any of the above.

    I am sure Tyree saw how awful Roberson is, yet still no minutes.
    I would have left too.

    Pat, if you want to stay around, get a FREAKING POINT GUARD!!!!!

    Report this comment

  • The Wizard said:

    I’m glad I didn’t watch this game. I get frustrated watching them make “dumb” mistakes as Coach Knight puts it. I’m not sure player personnel is the whole problem though.

    Report this comment

  • john said:

    I am amazed at how quickly Pat Knight has eroded this program, it felt like just yesterday we were in the Sweet 16. Pat Knight couldn’t get Jeff Taylor Jr. from Hobbs whos dad played for Tech to come to Tech, what makes people think this is the guy that can get it done on the recruiting trail.

    Report this comment

  • LKP (TTpilk645 on DT Nation) said:

    The old adage “It could get worse before it ever gets better” seems to be holding true with the Texas Tech men and women this year in basketball. Both coaches are struggling to achieve the success these two programs have been accustomed to having. Poor recruiting in the years prior to both coaches assuming control have been the biggest culprits in them playing so poorly now. I know the players are working hard to win each game, but their talent level is unfortunately low enough to prevent them from gaining the desired results. It will improve, hopefully as this year continues, but more probably starting next year with the addition of new blood, more importantly better athletes into the systems. I continue to follow and cheer on my Raiders, but am hopeful of much better times as they move forward. GO TECH!

    Report this comment

  • redraider97 said:

    Well put John, why are we talking about rebuild, wasn’t the point/benefit on him taking this over from his dad suppose to be about an easier transition? This is a Sean Sutton all over again. Pat may turn out good, but it is certainly painful to have to go through this after the momentum we had.

    Report this comment

  • tony said:

    pat knight better know how to recruit, or his stay will be short in lubbock. we simply do not have the players…

    Report this comment